Global HR and people platform built on Salesforce for mid sized multinational workforces
We may earn a commission if you buy via links on this page. It never affects how we rate software — how we make money.
People Systems Administrator, Northbridge Holdings
Staff like the portal, HR tolerates the admin side. Somewhere between those two sentences is why this is three stars.
Data quality and the audit trail are unarguable improvements.
None worth writing down yet.
HR Officer
LinkedIn verifiedThe gap between employee simplicity and admin complexity is the widest I have seen in an HR product, and we live on the wrong side of it.
Data, once in, is consistent and auditable.
Partner dependence for changes adds cost and delay to everything.
People Analytics Lead
It swallowed an acquisition of 150 people without drama. Data migrated, policies mapped, staff onboarded to self service within the month.
Absence balances calculate correctly for part timers and shift patterns, which our old system never managed.
Report building is powerful but the first few take patience to learn.
HR Generalist
LinkedIn verifiedReliable, auditable and quick to report from. If the admin screens matched the employee experience it would be a straight five.
Reporting flexibility, near enough anything can be a report or dashboard.
None worth writing down yet.
People Systems Administrator, Hazelmere Partners
The reporting alone justified the change. Questions from the executive team that used to take a week of spreadsheet work now take twenty minutes.
Reporting and dashboards are the standout, anything in the data can be on a dashboard by the afternoon.
It is not the cheapest option and the annual uplift needs watching at renewal.
HR Manager
LinkedIn verifiedOverall a strong system that does what was promised. The admin interface takes longer to learn than the brochure suggests, but the capability underneath is real.
The API let us connect our BI tool so people data joins the company dashboards.
Occasional release changes admin menus and you rediscover where things live.
HR Officer
LinkedIn verifiedIt does what it says, but the effort to configure anything new means changes queue up behind partner availability and budget.
Data quality and the audit trail are unarguable improvements.
Training material assumes more platform background than we had.
Head of People, Greystone Technologies
We are eighteen months in across three countries and the core is excellent. A few modules feel thinner than the core HR, which is why not five stars.
Time to fill and pipeline reporting from the recruiting module is genuinely useful.
Pricing is premium and the renewal uplift needed a negotiation.
HR Administrator, Fairhurst Legal LLP
Directors wrote the business case, I live in the system eight hours a day. Verdict from the engine room: it is logical, reliable and occasionally long winded. Common tasks are two clicks more than they need to be, but I trust it completely, nothing ever silently fails or loses data.
Bulk imports are dependable with clear error messages when a row is wrong. HR request queues keep my workload visible and nothing falls through cracks. Audit history on every field has settled several disputes.
Repetitive tasks would benefit from more keyboard flow, everything wants the mouse. Some screens carry fields we never use and cannot hide without partner help.
People Operations Manager
Eighteen months in, adoption outside HR remains poor and every fix seems to need partner time we have to buy. Hard to recommend for a company like ours.
Reporting depth is real when you can get to it.
Partner dependence for changes adds cost and delay to everything.